Vision

Quakers have a strong commitment to equality. This leads us to reject some conventional forms of hierarchy (such as the use of titles), to share power widely within our own church structures and to be willing to speak the truth to powerful bodies and individuals.

In wider society, the way that power is concentrated, shared and used is changing as a result of globalisation, geopolitics, new technology, growing use of artificial intelligence, new channels of communication, extreme inequality and other factors. These changes bring increased risks of unaccountable power, but also new opportunities for interconnected, engaged and flourishing democracy.

We want to support people to create a world in which power is more equally shared, and in which powerful institutions are responsive and accountable to wider society and aligned with the long-term public interest. We welcome work that scrutinises and holds these actors to account for perpetuating inequality, injustice or abuses of power, including systemic racism and corruption.

Funding priorities

  • 1. Strengthening corporate accountability

    Large corporations have significant power, and checks and balances are inadequately developed, particularly for trans-national corporations, including the largest digital platforms and intermediaries. We are interested in funding work which:

    • develops and promotes mechanisms which increase the accountability and responsiveness of companies to shareholders, stakeholders, regulators and the long-term public interest, for example through improvements to corporate governance, corporate structures (including alternative corporate forms), company reporting or regulation
    • develops and promotes mechanisms whereby those who suffer severely as a result of company actions, particularly marginalised groups, can gain access to justice
    • promotes the application of the same standards of accountability to large digital companies as other commercial organisations, for example with respect to taxation, consumer protection, treatment of minorities and the protection of rights
    • encourages a constructive dialogue across private, public and civil society sectors to define and develop values and norms of corporate accountability and transparency in relation to new digital technologies, including artificial intelligence. 
  • 2. Strengthening democratic accountability

    In a healthy democracy, government should be representative of the wider public and in touch with a wide range of groups, but not disproportionately influenced by any single interest. We are interested in funding work which:

    • develops and promotes mechanisms which ensure an accountable, transparent and proportionate relationship between the private sector and government
    • develops and promotes mechanisms which enable civil society and the general public, including marginalised groups, to engage appropriately and effectively with government policy making at all levels
    • encourages government, parliament and other statutory agencies to be more representative of the wider public they serve, in terms of gender, ethnicity and other factors  
    • supports the modernisation of the democratic infrastructure to increase its accessibility, relevance and resilience in a digital age
    • promotes greater transparency and accountability by digital intermediaries in relation to their impact on democracy and elections, and in AI and data driven systems used for public services and administrative decision-making.
  • 3. Encouraging responsible media

    All forms of media, including print, broadcast and social media, play important roles in a healthy democracy, but media companies and platforms can themselves be powerful and unaccountable, and artificial intelligence is changing the way the media operates. We are interested in funding work which:

    • encourages accurate and responsible media, with appropriate safeguards, including in the context of the growing use of artificial intelligence
    • helps to develop a relevant and proportionate response to the risks of misinformation and disinformation in commercial media   
    • explores and promotes ways for all forms of media to play a constructive role in holding government, companies and other powerful actors to account
    • helps to develop and strengthen infrastructure to support new forms of community journalism for the public benefit.

Other information

Under this programme, JRCT will consider applications for national work in the UK, or elsewhere in Europe for work at a pan-European level.

Specific exclusions

Please read the Trust’s general exclusions.

In addition to this the following types of work will not be funded:

  • is about democratic participation or user advocacy in relation to service provision, e.g. education and health
  • focuses on international development issues
  • is limited to corporate accountability in relation to a particular business sector, e.g. tourism or supermarkets
  • is general campaigning that is not concerned with the themes given above
  • supports individual journalists or news organisations to undertake investigations or create content.

Applying for funding 2025

The Power and Accountability programme is open to both new applicants and returning grantees in September 2025. Please note that we expect high demand and encourage applicants to contact us before applying to check on eligibility and fit with our funding policy. 

If you are a returning grantee and need advice, please contact your current grant lead at JRCT. If your current grant ends in 2025, you are welcome to reapply in September. Those with later end dates should reapply in 2026. 

For all other inquiries, please contact one of the team as follows:

 

Application deadlines

For further information see when to apply.

Case studies

An image showing hand drawn hearts on the National Covid Memorial Wall. Picture: chrisdorney - stock.adobe.com

Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice

Supporting a public inquiry into the handling of the pandemic

find out more